FAN
Fancyclopedia 2, Joe Siclari
A follower, devotee, or admirer of any sport or diversion. In our case the
diversion is fantasy in book and magazine form, on film, and on the airwaves.
The fan buys, sell, trades, collects, and discusses this stuff. Some of them
even read it. Professional editors, like Palmer of old, call all people who
read their magazines pretty regularly fans; and indeed the term is so used by
the stfnists who merely write letters to the editor and collect prozines.
The fen of fandom have a more restricted meaning in mind. What this
meaning is is difficult to say. (If the Greeks had a word for it, they never
used that word in public.) Generally one whom we designate as a fan in fandom
maintains a correspondence with other fans, and visits them when located in
the same area. He may publish or write for a fanzine --
or several of them. He often attends local club meetings, and, finances
permitting, conferences or national conventions. This is a matter of degree,
and depending on the extent to which a given fan indulges in anything more
than local club activity he may be distinguished as an
actifan. The comparative emphasis a fan puts on the different kinds of
activities determines whether he/she becomes known as a fanzine fan, a club
fan, or a convention fan; most fans do some of each, but only a few do enough
to avoid being labelled as one subspecies or another.
Introspectives like fans naturally do much speculating on what and why
fans are. Earl Kemp's fanzine symposium Why is a Fan? (1962) collected
several dozen prominent opinions on the matter. There have been various
theories: Gernsback's idea of developing potential scientific genius in his
readers; the idea that fans are a separate species, slans
or whatever you want to call them, which Degler made
ridiculous; that stfanaticism is sublimated sex drive; and that fans are
youngsters in blind alleys of life, seeking escape from "the humdrum,
workaday world." A theory well received is Norm Stanley's "sense of
fantasy," a taste for the imaginative analogous to the sense of humor.
Probably a complex of characteristics goes into the fan type. We do, however,
show some significant variations from the average in geographical
distribution, national extraction, age, sex distribution, intelligence,
introversion, and suchlike factors.
Dislike of the common connotations of the word "fan" led to the
suggestion of various substitutes for it, such as "stefnist" and
"imaginist."
|